It contains language-game, ostensive definition, family-resemblance and philosophy. 其内容包括语言游戏、实指定义、家族类似性和哲学。
This paper analyses the importance of form of life in philosophy and aesthetics of later wittgenstein, it means that form of life is not only the background of family-resemblance, is hut also the basis of language-game, it is standard for judging meanings. 摘要本文分析了生活形式在后期维特根斯坦哲学、美学中的重要性,这种重要性表现在生活形式不但是家族相似的背景,而且是语言游戏的落脚地,还是意义判断的标准。
Attributing philosophy to linguistic analysis or criticism, Wittgenstein constructs the philosophy of artificial language and then of natural language, the basic methods of which are known as the theory of meaning-picture and language-game. 他先后建立了人工语言哲学和自然语言哲学。意义图式说和语言游戏论就是这两种语言哲学的基本方法。
Metaphorizing as a language-game of training transfer then helps people to generalize their primary knowledge about language and world. 隐喻作为一种语言训练的游戏,能帮助人们归纳最初的语言知识与对世界的认识。
Next, we talk about two different opinions, following a rule is a practice, and rules are the basis of language-game. We point out that it is the key to different interpretations concerned with rule-following being a practice or as the basis of language-game. 接下来,展开对于遵守规则是实践,还是语言游戏得以进行的基础这两种不同观点的论述,指出语言游戏的规则是实践或者是基础,是研究者在遵守规则上的不同解读的关键。
The first is that certainty is the extrinsic foundation of language-game, the paper not supporting the view, and giving some refutation consulting other researchers 'opinions. 第一种观点认为确定性是语言游戏的外在基础,本文不赞同这种观点,并结合其他研究者的看法进行了驳斥。
Firstly, to elaborate the ultimate certainty of differing from knowledge; secondly, to discuss its effect "framework" or "foundation" in language-game, but this effect is the state of silence and beyond words. 本章首先分析了区别于知识的最终的确定性,其次论述了确定性在语言游戏起一种框架或基础的作用,但这种作用却处于某种沉寂的、不可说的状态。
Kripke suggests that normative meaning makes rule-following possible. However, we will discuss the relation between rule and meaning in the perspective that rules in language-game make the uses of words, namely meaning possible. 克里普克对维特根斯坦的解读主要是认为意义规范性使得遵守规则成为可能,不过我们将从语言游戏的规则使得词的使用(意义)成为可能这一角度研究二者之间的关系。